E-portfolio: Assessment Guidelines
This rubric may be used for self-assessment, peer and instructor feedback
To see original document, click: Assessment Rubric
|
Criteria
|
Indicators |
Emerging |
Consolidating |
Achieved |
| Design & Use of Media |
- Appearance & navigation are clear and consistent
- Links work
- Programming is appropriate
- Published materials respect fair use regulations (copyright rules & educational research)
|
|
|
|
- Audience & purpose of e-portfolio: integrated and respected in overall design
|
|
|
|
- Illustrations, sound and videos support subject matter & create interest
- Images: optimized for the web
- Text is readable (fonts, sizes & contrast)
|
- Student shows innovation in the way acquired knowledge is exhibited
|
|
|
|
| Selected Artifacts |
- Artifacts: directly relate to the focus of the e-portfolio
|
|
|
|
- Artifacts coherently linked with main research
- Pages, posts and categories allow for easy access to data
|
|
|
|
- Chosen items demonstrate significant achievements as well as understanding of theoretical concepts & practical applications
|
|
|
|
| Reflections |
- Metaphor:
- Appropriate
- Effective
- Presents an overarching theme
|
|
|
|
- Reflective comments:
- Relevant
- Incorporated into the e-portfolio
- Connect presentation with overall topic
|
|
|
|
- Creative & original thought enhance the content
- Spelling & grammar: accurate
|
|
|
|
| Overall portfolio |
- The portfolio represents the student’s learning in a variety of contexts & is coherently organized
|
|
|
|
- Items are clearly presented & skillfully displayed
|
|
|
|
- The e-portfolio is easy to read
- Informative & inspiring
|
|
|
|
| Results |
|
Emerging |
Consolidating |
Achieved |
